I mentioned the Ladda batteries yesterday. Another thing I bought in IKEA is their new Vinninge charger.
Only £1.80 for a charger with two separate charging channels, that can charge AAs and AAAs. How could I resist?
It is USB powered, so you can’t except a high charging current. According to the manual it is 220 mA for AAs and 110 mA for AAAs and the charge is terminated by individual minus delta voltage sensors (-dV). There’s also a separate safety timer and detection of non-rechargeable and damaged batteries.
The LED, placed behind the plastic case, so it is illuminating the case, is for both slots, so if you charge two batteries and one finishes early you wouldn’t know until the second one has finished.
Their existing Ladda charger, reviewed by Henrik Jensen, has a bit more oomph: it charges AAs with 1000 mA and AAAs with 500 mA. There’s also a new charger with 12 separate charging channels, called Storhögen, charging AAs with 250 mA and AAAs with 110 mA.
I hope Henrik will review the Vinninge charger on his Lygte Info web site in the future.
I bought some new rechargeable batteries at the weekend: IKEA’s Ladda batteries.
IKEA’s new rechargeable batteries look quite different to their previous ones, the silver / green Chinese made ones with 2000 mAh. The new ones look a bit like Eneloops as they have a a similar, slightly glittery label/wrapping around the battery’s body. They are also made in Japan, like the Eneloops, and the packaging implies that they are charged by solar energy, too – so it wouldn’t come as a surprise if they were made in the same factory as Eneloops.
Unlike Eneloops there is however no claim of low self discharge with the Ladda batteries – nevertheless, the 1,000 mAh Laddas seem similar to Eneloop lites and the 2,450 mAh Laddas seem similar to Eneloop pros.
I bought their low capacity version, the 1,000 mAh Laddas, four AAs for £2.75 – thinking they might be similar to Eneloop’s ‘lite’ batteries, which have ‘up to’ 1,000 mAh. When I discharged the Laddas in my Technoline IC8800 charger with 250 mA and charged them with 500 mA they ended up with a capacity between 993 mAh and 1020 mAh.
The top and the label/case (not sure what to call it) seems pretty similar, the date stamp, too, just the format is different. The bottom of the batteries is however quite different. The Ladda’s have a much smoother surface, at least compared to the latest Eneloops – I don’t have Eneloop lites to compare it too.
Anyway, even if they are from the same factory that doesn’t mean they are as good or use the same ‘ingredients’ or production methods. In any case, they seem pretty good value for money. I”m looking forward to trying them out.
Another command I want to write down, like dot_clean, so that I remember the details:
diff – Compare files line by line.
Usage: diff [OPTION]… FILES
FILES are `FILE1 FILE2′ or `DIR1 DIR2′ or `DIR FILE…’ or `FILE… DIR’.
Having recently bought two packs of Panasonic Eneloops from BeaconShop (Amazon Marketplace), the BK-3MCCE model, I was wondering whether they were fake, just because the blind date stamp on them looked quite different to the one on my other Eneloops and because they were quite cheap – £6.99 (Including a battery case, which looks different to the old battery cases).
Everything I checked was slightly off, but not enough to make me certain that they were fake.
The capacity should be at least 1900 mAh, I measured 1755 – 1776 mAh with my Technoline IC8800 charger.
The weight should be ~ 27 g, I measured between 25.8 – 25.9 g.
The dimensions should be 14.35 mm x 50.4 mm, I measured 14.15 mm x 50.23 mm.
I guess I’ll just keep an eye on them and hope they are the real thing.
Update: I bought another pack of the latest Eneloops from Maplin, hoping they have to be real if they are from the high street, and they seem very similar to the ones I bought online. When I checked their capacity (after discharging and charging in my IC8800 charger) they were slightly better than the ones bought online (1,788 – 1,808 mAh), but still not as good as they should be. Looks, weight (25.7 – 25.9 g) and date stamps of the Maplin and the online bought Eneloops were the same, so for now I believe that the ones bought online were real.
After a recent update broke my OpenELEC installation (or was it a problem with the SD card?) I thought I better write down all the steps to get it up and running again, in case I need to reinstall it again in the future.
Google is getting more impressive (and scary) all the time. Today a friend sent me an email where he asked me whether I have any idea what the items in the attached photos might be. Google’s Inbox figured out what the email was about and suggested three possible answers, see photo.
On the other hand Google also comes up with quite strange results. Look at the definition I got when I searched for Garnet.